Monday, January 19, 2015

The Vagina Monologues Cancelled at MHC


I go to a women's college. There are not many of us left in the world. Some feel that it is an outdated concept, that women are 100% equal now. So why do they still exist? First of all as much as I wish this was the case, women are not even close to 100% equality. Yes we can vote, yes we can have the same career as a man, but women still make 80 cents to the dollar every man makes. Female politicians are still meager within a patriarchal government and rape is still taking place on a massive scale. Women's colleges are relevant because they provide a space for women of all backgrounds and sexual orientations to come together and find they voice. This does that mean that we hate men or are afraid of men. In fact it makes us more confident when interacting and working with men. Women's colleges are not nunneries nor are they "lesbian factories." They inspire women to speak up, fight and demand for the rights that are still being denied to them. 

The first women's college in the United States, Mount Holyoke College has been in the news a lot lately. In September, President Lynn Pasquerella officially announced the admission of transgender students to the college. This policy change came soon after Smith College came under fire for supposedly refusing to admit a student based on the fact that he, now she, was transgender. If someone wishes to become a woman or a man, they are most welcome here. This has certainly created a campus wide dialogue about identity and inclusion. 

This dialogue has ultimately led to the cancellation of the Vagina Monologues, a decade long tradition. Project:Theater, the student room acting group which usually puts on the production, sent out an email stating that they would no longer be performing the play by world renowned feminist, Eve Ensler. This decisions was based on the belief that the play failed to represent people of all ethnicities and transgender people. The play, "s inherently reductionist and exscluve." Instead the group will be creating a Vagina Monologues inspired play which includes more racial and sexual diversity.

There have been mixed responses to this decision. I respect Project: Theater's decision. They seek to make sure that students on campus of all sexual orientations and backgrounds are represented. The play needs to speak to everyone. It is important to be conscious of everyone's perspective. But I also find this decision to be a bit incautious. Eve Ensler actually responded to this decision. She said, "I would like to believe that the play is outdated and irrelevant but sadly it isn;'t. I travel the planet, I've just come from many countries and the United States where 51% of the population has vaginas and aren't ab;e to have agency over those vaginas. W know that one out of every three women willl be raped or beaten in her lifetimes-so we know we have a long way to go before vaginas are liberated." 

Ensure actually visited the campus last year, giving a talk about her recent memoir. She has been very much an admired figure in all of the women's colleges. She further stated that, "I think it's important to know that I never intended to write a play about what it means to be a woman, that was not what the Vagina Monologues ever intended to be. It was a play about what it means to have a vagina. It never said for example, the definition of a woman is someone who has a vagina...I think that's a really important distinction." Ensler actually writes a new monologue every year for the play. In 2005, she came out with one entitled, "They Beat the Girl Out of My Boy," which was from the perspective a a transgender person. She also commented that thousands of women of color  have performed in The Vagina Monologues for the past 20 years.

In the end, Ensler respects Project: Theater's decision to make their own work. The group wants the ability to reach out to all campus perspectives. But I feel that they should have thought this decision through. No one else in campus was aware of this possibility until the decision had already been made. It is just one play that has happened to impact women who have vaginas or are without. It is play that speaks to all women. Ensler could only include so much. But she is continuing to add to it, to make it more diverse. It is an ever growing play. She is a respected and important figure within the feminist community. She believes in gender equality, racial equality, religious equality and the rights of people of all sexual orientations. She has never intended to exclude other perspectives. Project: Theater should definitely embark on the task of making their own play. But they should perform The Vagina Monologues as well. Especially for those who connect so much to the message of the play.

Sources:

Sunday, December 7, 2014

The Success of Feminism in 2014



This will be my last post for a little while, but I hope to continue my work with this blog. Whenever I look for current developments in women's rights throughout the world there is always an abundance of pressing issues. This is convenient for my blog but also incredibly sad. Will there ever come a time when the newsfeed will be flooded with elected females and feminist strides, instead of sexism and injustice?

Well here is some good news. Even though I've talked a lot about the bad in this blog, there is also quite a lot of good going on in the world of feminism. Mic.com recently released "The 39 Most Iconic Feminist Moments of 2014." Feminism is once again hitting the spotlight. But it's possible it may stick around for a long time. 

The list included a wide variety of people and events. Here are some of them:
  • Malala Yousafzai accepted the Nobel Peace Prize
  • 13-year old Mo'ne Davis pitched her team to the Little League World Series.
  • Emma Watson stunned audiences when she gave a speech to the UN as an official Goodwill Ambassador. She is telling the world that Hermione Granger is so last decade. Now she is inspiring all her young fans to embrace equality.
  • Columbia University senior, Emma Sulkowicz carried a mattress everywhere she went in protest. She would do this until her rapist was expelled. 
  • Even though the Democrats took a terrible beating during the midterm elections, a record of 100 women will serve in Congress. 
  • Transgender actress, Laverne Cox, has helped open doors for transgenders to come out into the spotlight. She has created a safer platform in which everyone can discuss what it means to be transgender.
  • Celebrities such as Jennifer Lawrence, BeyoncĂ© and Ellen Page have become feminist and gay-rights role models. Even though some people have issues with celebrities getting involved in activism, I say why the heck not? Why not have those who already have the spotlight use it to spread words of love and equality? 
  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has stood up for women in the courtroom. In an interview with Katie Couric, she stated that she would prefer all of the Supreme Court Justices to be female. 
  • The TV-screen is starting to see more diverse and complex female characters. The character of Olivia Pope on the hit show "Scandal" come out as a feminist. 
  • Women activists are taking a stand in the Ferguson protests. Women are at the forefront of activism in response to the shooting of Michael Brown. Even though they have not been widely represented in the media, they are the ones doing the actual work on the ground.
This is just some of the many other successes in 2014. But there is more that has to be done. Women have grabbed the world's attention. Now we need to use it properly in order to bring about change.

Sources:

Saturday, December 6, 2014

Another Threat to Pregnant Women



A few blog posts ago I discussed the arrest of pregnant women on suspicion of intended fetal homicide. This is not the only issue that many pregnant women are facing in the United States. A woman's body, pregnant or not, has always been a subject of public spectacle and argument. Women, we all know, reproduce. Pregnancy is part of human life and allows for the human race to grow and well, exist. So it would make sense treat our pregnant women with care and respect right? I mean the fate of humanity literally rests in their uteri.

Hundreds of countries around the world provide women and man with paid maternity leave. Sweden provides the best package, giving women 420 days (over a year) with 80% paid wages. The United States is by far one of the worst countries, giving women 12 weeks leave with NO pay. According to the Huffington Post, "Maternity leaves aren't simply a matter of time off for childcare--they can also strongly impact the rest of a child's life. According to a report by non-governmental organization Save The Children, in countries with longer periods of parental leave, children were found to be breastfed for long er and their life expectancy was higher." So here is yet another reason why we all have to move to Sweden. But I digress.

There is a significant Supreme Court case in the works right now that we must pay significant attention to. On December 3rd, the Supreme Court had a hard time understanding what duty employers have to pregnant women under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), in Young v United Parcel Service (UPS). This case came as a result of a UPS driver, Peggy Young, who became pregnant in2006. Young therefore requested "light duty", which was a temporary pass from lifting 70-pound packages. She could still perform all other duties while pregnant. But the company rejected her request stated that their pregnant workers were not included in the categories of eligible alternate assignments. Young then got unpaid leave and lost her pension and health benefits. This was in 2006, and since then, young has spent eight years trying to sue UPS for violating the PDA.

Justice Antonin Scalia, at Wednesday's hearing, stated that Young was demanding, "most-favored-nation status" for pregnant women. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in contrast, stated that the position of UPS put their pregnant workers in a "least-favoured nation" status. Lawyers and the Justices started bringing up examples of other potential health benefits, like a back-injury. But there should be a simple decision. Being pregnant isn't a health problem. It is a body's natural function. Questions of physical disability in comparison to pregnancy shouldn't be posed. What bothers me most is that corporations alongside many conservative republicans have been spending too much time trying to protect the rights of unborn fetuses instead of considering the rights of the women who carry them

A decision won't be made until June. Young has already waited eight-years for justice. This Supreme Court decision could impact millions of working women across the country.


Sources:


Friday, December 5, 2014

Sasha and Malia are Regular Teenagers? What a Shocker!


We don't see much of Sasha and Malia Obama often in the media. That's mainly because in 2008 when President Obama took office, he made it very clear that his daughters were "off limits." Why would he have to make that clear? Well the daughters of the last few presidents have been brutally bullied by the press. Radio pundent Rush Limbaugh called Chelsea Clinton a dog and Amy Carter the "most unattractive presidential daughter in the history of the country." So you can see why Obama had to raise his voice to the press and to political opponents.

Well that line has been crossed. Last week as is tradition, the President gave his Thanksgiving speech.  As he addressed the press and the nation, Sasha and Malia were at their father's side. They looked like normal teenagers. Dressed normally and with classic teenage facial expressions. You know the kind I mean? The face that says, "Dad you're so embarrassing with your corny jokes. I really don't want to be hear right now." Who wouldn't at that age?

But GOP Communications Director for Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-Tenn.), Elizabeth Lauten felt that this was not appropriate behavior for the daughters of a president. In response, she wrote on Facebook, "Act like being in the White House matters to you. Dress like you deserve respect, to a spot at a bar. And certainly don't make faces during televised, public events." She then asked them to show a "little class."

Seriously? Did you want them to dress up in ball gowns with perfect posture? They have attended this event for 8 years. All they have had to do is stand there and pet a turkey. It's a tradition that frankly any teenager would find boring. This disrespectful and frankly sexist comment (assuming that these girls should act in a certain way) is actually one of the lighter attack on the girls.

In 2010, when Malia reportedly asked her father about the BP oil spill clean up, Glenn back mocked her by saying, "Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy? Ask 'Daddy' why he hates black people so much." He continued to mock her with,  "That's the level of their education, that they're coming to-they're coming to Daddy and saying, 'Daddy, did you plug the hole yet?'" Talk about cruelty.

Last year when Obama made a statement in support of selling Plan B, a birth control product, to girls as young as 15, conservative Fox New host Andrea Tantaros pointed at the potential sex-life of 14-year old Malia: Are they gonna put her on birth control? Because he's very concerned with contraceptives and pharmaceuticals that going in the mouths of everybody else's 15-year-old daughter."

Lauten's comments sparked a media frenzy that immediately led to her resignation. She came out with a formal apology, stating, "When I first posted on Facebook I react to an article and I quickly judged the two young ladies in a way that I would never have wanted to be judged myself as a teenager."At least she apologized. Many other attackers have not. The fact that she immediately assumed something is what republican party members have become famous for. It is also speculation and no real fact. They just send messages of disrespect and hate out into the eather. Stop worrying about teenage use of the social media for a second and think about how people in government has been using it.

This will probably not be the last time that Sasha and Malia will be verbally attacked by Obama's political enemies. Lauren's comments have sparked a discussion of how a president's children, specifically "girls" should act in public. To expect his daughters to act like "ladies" and remain stoic shows that this country still hasn't opened up to the possibility that they can wear and act in whatever way they choose.

Keep being yourself Sasha and Malia! You have a right to act like any other teenager!

Sources:

Sunday, November 30, 2014

The Battle of the Body

Actress Keira Knightly has been mentioned in this blog in regards to her work in the fight against domestic violence. Knightly recently posed topless in an Interview magazine photoshoot. But this wasn't a typical nude photoshoot. This was meant to show her fans what she really looks like without computer enhancements. In the past her body had been altered to look curvier and her breasts larger. Enough was enough. Here as you see above (censored), Knightly stands in a model pose but with bony, skinny, muscle-less body with small breasts. This is a clear message to the misrepresentation of women in magazines. The photo seems to say, "Take it or leave it!"

In an interview with The Times, Knightley stated, "I think women's bodies are a battleground. And photography is partly to blame." Knightly is one of many female celebrities who have taken a stand against unrealistic beauty standards. The list ranges from Jamie Lee Curtis, Lorde, Kate Winslet, Ashley Benson, Colbie Caillet, Lady GaGa, to Gisele Bundchen and countless others. These women, who have been looked up to by millions of young girls and women, are speaking up. They have pimples, they have fat and they have wrinkles. Society has some how managed to convince women that none of that is okay. That we have to look "beautiful" all the time in order to be accepted. 


If you are interested in the process of how computer enhancement works, here is a shocking clip produced by The Dove Self-Esteem Fund:

Sources:


Gender Equality Report



Last month, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released a report regarding the current worldwide gender gap. The report measures female economic participation, education, health and political involvement. Overall women currently have 60% of the standing of men. It will apparently take 81 years for the gender gap to close if progress continues at the present rate. The report, however, does not measure quality of life amongst women; this includes reproductive freedom. 

All five of the Nordic Countries, which includes Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark, have closed more than 80% of their gender gap. Nicaragua went up to the sixth position followed by Rwanda. The United States doesn't even show up on the top ten list.


Unfortunately the political empowerment gap is at a meager metric of 21%. This means that 2 out of 10 positions represent women. According to the WEF, this is an improvement since the last report in 2006. 

Overall it seems that Iceland is the best place on Earth in terms of gender equality. Let's all move to Iceland!

Sources:



President Erdogan's Sexist Comments


President Recap Tayyip Erdogan has been in the news a lot lately. Everything from his inability to take action against ISIS to the construction of a new 50-acre presidential palace, has not painted a pleasant picture of this secularist nation. But President Erdogan has succeeded in sparking outrage again within the international community. In a women's right conference in Ankara last week, Erdogan made several offensive comments. At a women's rights conference no less!
Here are some of the things that he said:

"You cannot make women and men equal; this is against nature."

"You cannot subject a pregnant woman to the same working conditions as a man. You cannot make a mother who has to breastfeed her child equal to a man. You cannot make women do everything men do like the communist regimes did...This is against her delicate nature."

"Feminists don't accept the concept of motherhood."

"But those who do understand are enough for us. We'll continue down this path with them."

These comments instantly sparked an outflow of arguments on social media. Family and Social Policies Minister Aysenur Isla interrupted the speech and insisted on questioning the Minister. She was removed from the room by security as a disturbance.

This is not the first time the public has become aware of Erdogan's sexist beliefs. In August he made other sexist comments along with a proposal to limit abortion rights and the morning-after pill.

The President of Turkey clearly needs to take a Gender Studies class. Not only are his comments offensive and unacceptable, but they are also not backed up with facts. Show me the facts regarding pregnant women's productivity! "Delicate nature"? What century is he living in? Mustafa Kemal sought to bring Turkey out of the dark ages and into the light of a just and equal society. I don't even understand where he learned that feminists weren't good mothers. Does that make my mother unfit? Just because she believes in equality? Clearly, Erdogan's comments lack any form of accuracy or authority.

Sources: